Review



rabbit anti grin2c  (Novus Biologicals)


Bioz Verified Symbol Novus Biologicals is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Novus Biologicals manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Novus Biologicals rabbit anti grin2c
    Rabbit Anti Grin2c, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti grin2c/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 4 article reviews
    rabbit anti grin2c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Alomone Labs rabbit anti glun2c
    Homeostatic enrichment of <t>GluN2C-NMDARs</t> in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).
    Rabbit Anti Glun2c, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti glun2c/product/Alomone Labs
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti glun2c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Novus Biologicals rabbit anti grin2c
    Homeostatic enrichment of <t>GluN2C-NMDARs</t> in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).
    Rabbit Anti Grin2c, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti grin2c/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti grin2c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Alomone Labs rabbit anti nr2c
    Homeostatic enrichment of <t>GluN2C-NMDARs</t> in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).
    Rabbit Anti Nr2c, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti nr2c/product/Alomone Labs
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti nr2c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Boster Bio rabbit anti grin2c
    Homeostatic enrichment of <t>GluN2C-NMDARs</t> in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).
    Rabbit Anti Grin2c, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti grin2c/product/Boster Bio
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti grin2c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Alomone Labs rabbit
    Homeostatic enrichment of <t>GluN2C-NMDARs</t> in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).
    Rabbit, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit/product/Alomone Labs
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Alomone Labs rabbit antiglun2c polyclonal antibody
    Homeostatic enrichment of <t>GluN2C-NMDARs</t> in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).
    Rabbit Antiglun2c Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit antiglun2c polyclonal antibody/product/Alomone Labs
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit antiglun2c polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher rabbit anti-grin2c
    Homeostatic enrichment of <t>GluN2C-NMDARs</t> in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).
    Rabbit Anti Grin2c, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti-grin2c/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti-grin2c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Alomone Labs rabbit polyclonal anti nr2c
    Homeostatic enrichment of <t>GluN2C-NMDARs</t> in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Nr2c, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti nr2c/product/Alomone Labs
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti nr2c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Homeostatic enrichment of GluN2C-NMDARs in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: GluN2B-mediated regulation of silent synapses for receptor specification and addiction memory

    doi: 10.1101/2024.05.19.594887

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Homeostatic enrichment of GluN2C-NMDARs in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).

    Article Snippet: Sliced sections were blocked with 4 % normal goat serum and 0.45 % Triton X-100 in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer at 4°C for 1 hour and then were incubated with primary antibodies as follows: rabbit anti-GluN2B (AGC-003, Alomone labs., Israel), rabbit anti-GluN2C (AGC-018, Alomone labs.), mouse anti-GluA2 (MAB397, Millipore, MA), rabbit anti-Rac1 (05-389, 1:500, Millipore, MA), or mouse anti-GTP-Rac1 (#26903, NewEast Bioscience, PA) antibodies at 4 °C overnight.

    Techniques: Control, Virus, Labeling, Activity Assay, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY

    Homeostatic enrichment of GluN2C-NMDARs in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: GluN2B-mediated regulation of silent synapses for receptor specification and addiction memory

    doi: 10.1101/2024.05.19.594887

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Homeostatic enrichment of GluN2C-NMDARs in the absence of GluN2B. (A) Example traces of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs (red traces for cKD; black traces for control, left). Averaged NMDAR-EPSCs from D1-MSNs are compared between cocaine-treated mice that received either GluN2B cKD or control virus (n = 33 cells for cKD; n = 25 cells for control groups, right). ( B) I-V curves of normalized NMDAR-EPSCs under 100 µM of Mg 2+ from D1-MSNs in cocaine-treated mice (red, n =18 cells for cKD; black, n = 15 cells for control groups). ( C) averaged traces of NMDAR-EPSCs from cocaine-treated D1-MSNs with GluN2B antagonist (Ifenprodil, magenta) and additional GluN2C antagonist (PPDA, green) at +50 mV holding potential in the presence of PTX and NBQX (left). Sensitivity of NMDAR-EPSCs to Ifenprodil or PPDA is compared between mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 10 cells for Ifenprodil/control; n = 9 cells for PPDA/control; n =13 cells for Ifenprodil/cKD; n = 13 cells for PPDA/cKD, right). ( D) Representative confocal images of GluN2C-positive puncta (red) in cocaine-treated D1-MSNs (green, left). Scale bar = 5 μm. Quantification of GluN2C puncta after cocaine administration is compared between mice that received either shGluN2B or control virus (n = 12 cells for cKD; n = 16 cells for control groups, right). ( E) Immuno-electron microscopic images showing subcellular localization of GluN2C (18 nm gold particles, cyan blue arrows) and eYFP for labeling of D1-MSNs (6 nm gold particles, green arrows, left). Scale bar = 100 μm. GluN2C particles present within the synaptic areas are compared between cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B or control virus (n = 7 cells for both cKD and control groups, right). ( F) Example plots of evoked EPSCs with minimal optical stimulation (failure trials in red dots; successful trials in black dots) without and with PPDA (left). The proportion of silent synapses is compared before and after PPDA administration in cocaine-treated mice that previously received shGluN2B virus (n = 11 cells, right). ( G) An experimental timeline of PPDA or vehicle treatment for behavioral assays. ( H) Quantified CPP scores in the cocaine-paired chamber are compared between PPDA- and vehicle-infused cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 6 mice for vehicle). ( I) Locomotor activity was monitored upon cocaine infusion on a daily basis between PPDA- and vehicle-treated cKD mice (n = 4 mice for PPDA; n = 5 mice for vehicle groups). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (error bars); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-tailed unpaired t test, Mann-whitney, Wilcoxon test, or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons).

    Article Snippet: After blocking, membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies, mouse anti-GluNR1 (1:1,000 for #05-432, Millipore, MA), rabbit anti-GluNR2A (1:1,000 for #07-632, Millipore, MA), rabbit anti-GluNR2B (1:1,000 for #AGC-003, Alomone lab) or mouse anti-GluN2B (1:500 for #610416, BD Transduction Lab, NJ), rabbit anti-NR2C (1:1,000 for #AGC-018, Alomone lab), rabbit anti-GluA1(1:2,000 for #13185, Cell signaling Technology, MA), mouse anti-GluA2 (1:2,000 for #MAB397, Milipore) and anti-β-actin (1: 10,000 for #A5441, Sigma).

    Techniques: Control, Virus, Labeling, Activity Assay, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY